Legal Opinion
Bradshaw v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 29, 2000No. 98-708LPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARGOLIS, Senior Judge.
This takings ease is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss or alternatively for summary judgment. Plaintiffs, owners of a ranch in Nevada, seek compensation under the Fifth Amendment for deprivation of property rights that they claim to own. The property rights that plaintiffs claim to own include water rights in springs located on public lands; ditches and right-of-ways to water on public lands; grazing and forage rights on public lands; improvements made on public lands; heads of cattle; damage to their ranch by feral horses; and the loss of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kleppe v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Henry Hendler, Paul Garrett, Tillie Goldring, as Trustees, and Henry Hendler and Irving Gronsky v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- United States v. FullerSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Light v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Maynard Alves v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Conti v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- American Pelagic Fishing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Page v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Arctic King Fisheries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Colvin Cattle Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.