Legal Opinion

Warren Trust v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 30, 2012No. 10-06 LPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SWEENEY, Judge

Before the court is plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on liability and defendant’s cross-motion to dismiss or for summary judgment on liability. In this case, plaintiffs, the Warren Trust and the Marietta Trust (“plaintiffs” or “the Trusts,” collectively), allege that the government effected a regulatory taking under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution by *539applying a regulatory regime on the Trusts’ property, which is located in a former bombing range in Louisiana. The Trusts seek summary judgment on liability, and defendant moves,…

2Cases cited95 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. International Federation of Professional & Technical Engineers, Local 1 v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  2. Taylor v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API