Legal Opinion

Wendell v. Long

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 21, 1992No. 9115SC452PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Chief Judge.

Although neither party raises the question in their briefs, we ex mero motu consider whether plaintiffs have alleged in their complaint an actual justiciable controversy sufficient to give the superior court jurisdiction to determine this matter pursuant to the Declaratory Judgment Act.

The authority of our court to render declaratory judgments is set forth in G.S. 1-253 which provides in part:

Courts of record within their respective jurisdictions shall have power to declare rights, status, and other legal relations, whether or not further relief is or could be claimed ....

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gaston Board of Realtors, Inc. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Sharpe v. Park Newspapers of Lumberton, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Bland v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Bland v. City of WilmingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  5. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bueltel v. Lumber Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  2. Town of Pine Knoll Shores v. Carolina Water Service, Inc. of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  3. New Bar Partnership v. MartinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  4. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Carolina Water Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. Chapel H.O.M. Associates, LLC v. RME Management, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API