Legal Opinion

North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Warren

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 1, 1988No. 873SC889PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Chief Judge.

Although the question has not been discussed by either party in its brief, we ex mero mo tu consider whether plaintiff, in its complaint, has alleged an actual justiciable controversy in support of a declaratory judgment action.

An actual controversy must exist for there to be an action under the Declaratory Judgment Act. Sharpe v. Park Newspapers of Lumberton, 317 N.C. 579, 347 S.E. 2d 25 (1986). Determination of what is an actual controversy and how the act operates is found in Lide v. Mears, 231 N.C. 111, 117, 56 S.E. 2d 404, 409 (1949):

There is much misunderstanding as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lide v. MearsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Gaston Board of Realtors, Inc. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Sharpe v. Park Newspapers of Lumberton, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Town of Tryon v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. Kirkman v. KirkmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Western World Insurance v. CarringtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  2. Wendell v. LongCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  3. Cinoman v. University of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  4. Cinoman v. Univ. of N.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  5. Wendell v. LongCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API