Legal Opinion
Davies v. Philip Morris, USA
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided October 17, 1994No. Civ. A. 93-K-602PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
KANE, Senior District Judge.
Before me on Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is another employment discrimination action brought by a former Philip Morris, USA (“Philip Morris”) sales representative fired after allegedly falsifying cigarette sales records. 1 While Plaintiffs claims in the present action are similar to those pled and dismissed on summary judgment in Crumpton, the facts vary significantly and preclude a similar disposition. For the reasons set forth below, I deny Defendants’ motion for summary judgment…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Sharon G. CONE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LONGMONT UNITED HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, a Colorado Corporation, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brunetti v. RubinDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1998
- Johnson v. N.T.I.District Court, D. Colorado · 1995
- Schnurr v. Board of County Com'rs of JeffersonDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2001
- Woodson v. Scott Paper Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995