Brunetti v. Rubin
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BABCOCK, District Judge.
Defendant Noreen Medeiros (Medeiros) moves to dismiss the extreme and outrageous conduct claim of plaintiff, Denise Brunetti. The motion is adequately briefed and oral argument will not materially aid its resolution. For the reasons set forth below, I grant in part and deny in part Medeiros’ motion to dismiss.
I. PLEADING STANDARDS
Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) states that a court may dismiss a complaint for “failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.” The complaint should not be dismissed under Rule 12(b)(6) “unless it appears beyond…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Davis v. SchererSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- International Management Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Mathis v. HendersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Shepherd v. United States Olympic CommitteeDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2006
- Kibbe v. PotterDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
- Wallace v. HendersonDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.