Legal Opinion
Woodson v. Scott Paper Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 4, 1995No. Civ. A. 93-6076PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
LUDWIG, District Judge.
Defendant Scott Paper Company’s post-verdict motion for judgment as a matter of law, to alter the judgment or, in the alternative, for a new trial, will be granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff James W. Woodson’s motion for prejudgment interest will be granted. The verdict will be reduced to $1,496,698.70.
This employment discrimination action, filed November 16, 1993, was brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e, et seq.; the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act, 43 P.S. §§ 951 et seq.; the Civil Rights Act of…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ricardo Jalil v. Avdel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Commercial Office Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Armbruster v. Unisys Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- James W. Woodson v. Scott Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- De Llano v. NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVER.District Court, D. North Dakota · 1997
- Woodson v. Scott Paper CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997