Legal Opinion
E. W. Edwards & Son v. Pacific Coast Casualty Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 15, 1916Published
Motion to dismiss complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtSawyer, J.
On the 30th day of October,. 1910, defendant by a so-called casualty policy agreed to indemnify plaintiff against loss or expense arising from claims upon it for damage on account of injuries or accidents suffered, or alleged to have been suffered, during a period of three years from that date by any person while within plaintiff’s store premises, or upon the sidewalk, or other ways immediately adjacent thereto. The policy in question contains, among others, the following condition:
“ B. Upon the occurrence of an accident the Assured shall give to the Company, or to its duly authorized agent,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hauser v. North British & Mercantile InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Woolverton v. . Fidelity Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Press Publishing Co. v. General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp. of Perth, Scotland, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- Hauser v. North British & Mercantile InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912