Hauser v. North British & Mercantile Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Submission of a controversy upon an agreed statement of. facts pursuant to section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
1Opinion of the Court
Miller, J.:
The plaintiff as broker placed insurance with the defendant for other persons, and the. question involved is whether he is entitled to his commissions in view of the fact that his application under section 142 of the Insurance Law (Consol. Laws, chap. 28 [Laws of 1909, chap. 33], added by Laws of 1911, chap. 748), as amended by chapter 1 of the Laws of 1912, to the Superintendent of Insurance for a certificate of authority to act as broker had been denied on the ground that he did not set forth in his application that he was engaged or intended to engage in good faith principally…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Schwab v. . GrantNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- People v. . RingeNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Frank L. Fisher Co. v. WoodsNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. NewmanNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1919
- Martin v. County of MadisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Stern v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
- Barna v. Clifford Country Estates, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1932
- E. Fougera & Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.