Legal Opinion

Gorgoza, Inc. v. Utah State Road Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1976No. 14351PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice:

Plaintiff, Gorgoza, Inc. brought this action based on allegations of breach of contract and negligence, to recover for damages to its resort property just east of the summit of Parley’s Canyon, in Summit County, resulting from the construction of the new interstate highway 1-80. The trial court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

Plaintiff appeals, contending that there was a valid agreement between the parties, as to the manner of construction and maintenance of the road, which the defendant has failed to perform; that therefore, governmental immunity is not a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Springville Banking Co. v. BurtonUtah Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Fairclough v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Jones v. Mutual Creamery Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Hampton v. State Ex Rel. Road CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Bailey Service & Supply Corp. v. State Ex Rel. Road CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Loveland v. Orem City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Loveland v. Orem City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API