Legal Opinion
Mann v. Mueller
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 4, 1956No. Civ. 21482PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, P. J.
Defendants have appealed from the judgment for plaintiff for real estate broker’s commission. The following statement of the case is quoted from respondent’s brief:
“Plaintiff’s complaint alleged: That plaintiff was, at all material times, a real estate broker duly licensed by the State of California. That on July 3, 1954, defendants were the owners of certain real property and that other persons were the owners of other real property. That on said date defendants and one H. H. Young entered into a written standard exchange agreement by the terms of which defendants agreed to exchange their…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Buxbom v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Gordon v. Aztec Brewing Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
- Autry v. Republic Productions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1947
- Lawrence Block Co. v. PalstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Alonso v. HillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- California Food Service Corp. v. Great American InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- In Re Storage Technology Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1985
- Wesley N. Taylor Co. v. RussellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Austin v. RichardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.