Legal Opinion
Fritz v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 29, 1987No. Appeal, 1390 C.D. 1984PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Barry,
This appeal results from an order of the Workmens Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed a referees decision denying the claim petition of Joseph Fritz (claimant).
Claimant was employed with the defendant, Kim Manufacturing Co. (employer) from September, 1948 to November, 1977 in a variety of capacities, concluding his employment as the plant supervisor in Downing-town. On April 24th, 1980, claimant filed a claim petition alleging “[l]iver damage and cancer of kidney [sic] resulting from exposure to Tricholorethylene, Perchloroethylene, Phosgene, and Hydrocarbon…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Estate of McGovern v. Commonwealth, State Employees' Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Bass v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Wise v. Cambridge Springs BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Tony Grande, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Republic Steel Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Daniels v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Williamson v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Pittsburgh Moose Lodge 46 v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Fiorentino v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Crown, Cork & Seal Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.