Trudnak v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
NARICK, Senior Judge.
Bernard J. Trudnak (Claimant) petitions for review of an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that affirmed the referee’s decision denying benefits. We affirm.
Claimant filed an occupational disease claim against Lucky Strike Coal Corporation (Employer) alleging he was disabled as a result of anthracosilicosis as of January 3, 1989. Hearings were held before the referee who found that Claimant suffered from anthracosilicosis and was totally disabled. Employer appealed to the Board alleging that the referee’s decision was unsupported by the record and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cudo v. Hallstead Foundry, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Arena v. Packaging Systems Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Universal Trucking, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- A & P Tea Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Fiorentino v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Daniels v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Puhl v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Daniels v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Matthews v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Matthews v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.