Legal Opinion
United States ex rel. Lank Woodwork Co. v. CSH Contractors, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 6, 1978No. Civ. No. 78-463PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JOHN H. PRATT, District Judge.
The sole issue raised by the cross-motions for summary judgment filed by the subcontractor and surety in this action under the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C. §§ 270a, 270b, is whether the action was timely filed under the one-year limitations period incorporated in the Act. Id. § 270b(b). To prevail on a motion for summary judgment, a party must demonstrate that no genuine issue of material fact, viewed in the light most favorable to the opposing party, impedes its right to judgment as a matter of law. Fed. R.Civ.P. 56(c); see Bloomgarden v. Coyer, 156…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Henry S. Bloomgarden v. Charles B. CoyerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Western Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- General Insurance Company of America v. United States for the Use of Audley Moore & SonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. GullardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- United States ex rel. Palmer Asphalt Co. v. DebardelabenDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Highland Renovation Corp. v. Hanover Insurance GroupDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- United States Ex Rel. Hussmann Corp. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- United States ex rel. Billows Electric Supply Co. v. E. J. T. Construction Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- United States v. Sun Engineering Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1993
- United States Ex Rel. American Civil Construction, LLC v. Hirani Engineering & Land Surveying, P.C.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.