Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Bean

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1984No. 18624PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OAKS, Justice:

This is a case of first impression in this state on the right of contribution among co-guarantors of an installment debt. The court gave a judgment for contribution, and defendants appeal. We reverse because the judgment is premature on the facts of this case.

Plaintiff Gardner and defendants Bean 1 each owned 50 percent of the common stock of Firebrand, Inc. (dba Diamond Tire Center). In 1969, with the help of a guarantee from the Small Business Administration (SBA), Firebrand borrowed $150,000 from a Utah bank. Pursuant to SBA requirements, the Beans and Gardner signed separate…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Burnell Keath Uptagrafft, and State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
  2. Glades County, Fla. v. Detroit Fidelity & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
  3. Nissenberg v. FellemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  4. Fidelity & Casualty Insurance v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  5. Richter v. HenningsanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kafka v. PopeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  2. DLB Collection Trust Ex Rel. Helgesen & Waterfall v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1995
  3. Humphrey v. O'CONNORColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Randles v. HansonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. CIG Exploration, Inc. v. HillDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API