Fidelity & Casualty Insurance v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
The complaint demurred to is composed of three counts, containing identical allegations of fact except that the second count also states a demand made of the defendant and its failure to pay. The second count further alleges as a legal conclusion the defendant’s implied agreement to indemnify the plaintiffs, and the third in like manner one to contribute. The plaintiffs’ brief describes the first count as alleging a cause of action in tort, the second for reimbursement or indemnity, and the third for contribution. The facts alleged are in substance these: The plaintiff Insurance Company, duly…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. BrameSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. New York & New Haven RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1856
- Kennerson v. Thames Towboat Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
- Byrd v. EnglishSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Perdue v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Kaplan v. Merberg Wrecking CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Blake v. LevySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Sykes v. Stone & Webster Engineering Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1947
- Hanover Insurance v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Kentucky Laborers District Council Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Hill & Knowlton, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1998
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.