Legal Opinion

Fidelity & Casualty Insurance v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 8, 1938PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The complaint demurred to is composed of three counts, containing identical allegations of fact except that the second count also states a demand made of the defendant and its failure to pay. The second count further alleges as a legal conclusion the defendant’s implied agreement to indemnify the plaintiffs, and the third in like manner one to contribute. The plaintiffs’ brief describes the first count as alleging a cause of action in tort, the second for reimbursement or indemnity, and the third for contribution. The facts alleged are in substance these: The plaintiff Insurance Company, duly…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. BrameSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. New York & New Haven RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1856
  3. Kennerson v. Thames Towboat Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
  4. Byrd v. EnglishSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  5. Perdue v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Kaplan v. Merberg Wrecking CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
  2. Blake v. LevySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  3. Sykes v. Stone & Webster Engineering Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1947
  4. Hanover Insurance v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  5. Kentucky Laborers District Council Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Hill & Knowlton, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1998

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API