Legal Opinion

Newberry v. Industrial Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1930No. 20223. Judgment reversed and award set asidePublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Heard

Plaintiff in error, Mary L. Newberry, by leave of this court has sued out a writ of error to review a judgment of the circuit court of Cook county confirming an award of the Industrial Commission against her, in favor of Bessie Phinney, for compensation at the rate of $12.50 per Week for 300 weeks under the Workmen’s Compensation act, for accidental injuries resulting in the death of Daniel P. Phinney, her husband.

There is no dispute as to the facts. On September 29, 1927, Daniel P. Phinney, who was employed as a watchman at a building located at Townsend and Huron streets, Chicago, was found…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lohr v. Barkmann Cartage Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Johanson v. William Johnston Printing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1914
  3. County of Winnebago v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Consumers Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Pacific Employers Insurance v. ChavezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. National Alliance v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Atlas Linen Supply Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Jording v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API