Legal Opinion
Broderick v. Donaldson
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 20, 2004No. Civil Action 02-0159 (AK)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
KAY, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgement (“Motion”) [27], Plaintiffs Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgement (“Opposition”) [35], and Defendant’s Reply to Plaintiffs Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgement (“Reply”) [40]. Upon consideration of the pleadings, the entire record herein, and Oral Argument held on September 9, 2004, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgement should be and hereby is GRANTED.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Plaintiffs Employment History & First Title VII Lawsuit
Catherine…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Broderick, Catherine v. Donaldson, WilliamCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Nurriddin v. GoldinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Edwards v. AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Hussain v. PrincipiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Ware v. BillingtonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.