Legal Opinion

Rhoades v. Townsend

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 6, 1934No. Civ. No. 7921Published

1Opinion of the Court

HAHN, J., pro tem.

This appeal comes to us from a money judgment rendered against each of the defendants in an action to enforce a stockholders’ liability for an alleged indebtedness owing by the Metals Refining Company, *123a corporation, in which, defendants were stockholders at the time the indebtedness was incurred.

The points involved in the appeal, as stated by appellants in their brief, are as follows: “1. There can be no stockholders’ liability in a corporation having a dual stock structure. 2. Stock of a Maine corporation, issued in Maine, and transferred in California, without a permit…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Coombes v. GetzSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Pollak v. StauntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. People v. PaceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. Miles v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Commonwealth Acceptance Corp. v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API