Legal Opinion

Ross v. Cnty. of Riverside

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided June 20, 2019No. D075106PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCONNELL, P. J.

*583I

INTRODUCTION

Christopher Ross appeals from a summary judgment granted in favor of the County of Riverside on Ross's claims for violation of Labor Code section 1102.5 and for violation of the provisions in the Fair Employment and Housing Act ( Gov. Code, § 12900 et seq. ; FEHA) prohibiting disability discrimination, failure to reasonably accommodate, failure to engage in the interactive process, and failure to prevent disability discrimination.1 Because we conclude there are triable issues of material fact on the questions of whether Ross engaged in protected activity under Labor Code section…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Green v. Ralee Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Curle v. Superior Court of Shasta CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Ennabe v. ManosaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  4. American National Insurance v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSN. OF SAN DIEGO, INC. v. City of OceansideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Behazin v. Dignity Health CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2020
  2. Brandy Brewer v. Leprino Foods CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  3. Casey v. Sumitomo (SHI) Cryogenics of America, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2019
  4. Clayton Del Thibodeau v. Adt LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  5. Erhart v. Bofi Holding Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2020

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API