Legal Opinion
Casey v. Sumitomo (SHI) Cryogenics of America, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided August 14, 2019No. 3:19-cv-00937Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KATHRYN CASEY, an individual, Case No.: 19cv937-CAB-BGS 12 Plaintiff, ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO 13 v. DISMISS AND TO STRIKE [Doc. No. 9] 14 SUMITOMO (SHI) CRYOGENICS OF AMERICA, INC., 15 Defendant. 16 17 On July 1, 2019, Defendant Sumitomo (SHI) Cryogenics of America, Inc. 18 (“Defendant” or “SCAI”) filed a motion to dismiss and to strike Plaintiff’s First Amended 19 Complaint pursuant to Fed.R. Civ.P. 12(f) and 12(b)(6). [Doc. No. 9.] On July 22, 2019, 20 Plaintiff Kathryn Casey (“Plaintiff”) filed an…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.