Legal Opinion
Erhart v. Bofi Holding Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided April 2, 2020No. 3:15-cv-02287Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 CHARLES MATTHEW ERHART, Case No. 15-cv-02287-BAS-NLS 13 consolidated with Plaintiff, 15-cv-02353-BAS-NLS 14 ORDER GRANTING IN PART 15 v. AND DENYING IN PART 16 BOFI HOLDING, INC., CHARLES ERHART’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE 17 Defendant. EXPERT TESTIMONY (ECF No. 128) 18 19 20 21 And Consolidated Case 22 23 24 Presently before the Court is Charles Erhart’s motion to exclude the opinions 25 of two experts that BofI Federal Bank plans to call at trial. (ECF No. 128.) BofI 26 opposes. (ECF No. 152.) The Court finds…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Primiano v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Lifewise Master Funding v. TelebankCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.