Legal Opinion
Robert O. Gilmore, Jr. v. Thomas C. Lynch
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 16, 1968No. 22052 A-B-C-D-E-FPublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MERRILL, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is taken from an interloeu-tory order of the District Court for the Northern District of California denying petitioners’ motion for the convening of a three-judge court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2281. 1
The appeal is taken pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), the district judge having, in his order, certified that in his opinion the order involved “a controlling question of law as to which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion,” and that “an immediate appeal from the order may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation.” The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ex Parte PoreskySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Phillips v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- California Water Service Co. v. City of ReddingSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Mark O. Hatfield, Governor of the State of Oregon v. Paul R. BailleauxCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
- McCormick & Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Robert O. Gilmore, Jr., and Inmates of San Quentin State Prison, United States of America, Intervenor v. People of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Gilmore v. LynchDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1970
- Wright v. EnomotoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1978
- Clutchette v. ProcunierDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1971
- John Wesley Clutchette v. Raymond J. ProcunierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.