Legal Opinion

Lutkens v. Young

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1911No. 9470PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Lewis county, Rice, J., entered October 3, 1910, in favor of the plaintiffs, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action to quite title.

1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.

In this action the respondents sought to quiet title as against appellant, and being successful in the lower court, we are asked to review the judgment upon assignments of error, one of which is jurisdictional and, if allowed, defeats the judgment.

*453Appellant, who had obtained his-title to the property in controversy through a sheriff’s deed under an execution obtained upon a judgment against Fred W. Muller, attacked a judgment of foreclosure of mortgage under which respondents claimed- to derive title, by claiming in his answer that the judgment was invalid in that no jurisdiction was obtained…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ladenburg v. Commercial BankNew York Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Rogers v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Harris v. ClaflinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  4. Wick v. ReaWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. McManus v. MorganWashington Supreme Court · 1905

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. EkangerWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Burns v. StolzeWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Hatch v. Princess Louise Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  4. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. EkangerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  5. Pullman v. PullmanWashington Supreme Court · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API