Legal Opinion

Burns v. Stolze

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1920No. 15820PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Card, J., entered March 2, 1920, in favor of the defendant, in an action to vacate a judgment, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.

Prior to July 17, 1919, Ida M. Stolze, the respondent here; brought suit in the superior court of Pierce county, Washington, against Florence Stolze (now by marriage Florence Burns), the appellant here, to set aside a certain deed theretofore made to her, covering lots 1 to 8, inclusive, block 26, Cascade Park addition to the city of Tacoma, Washington, and to quiet title in her, Ida M. Stolze. Thereafter the court entered judgment by default in her favor against Florence Stolze, cancelling and annulling the deed mentioned and quieting title as prayed. This is an independent suit or…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. City of Ballard v. WayWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Gould v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. McPhee v. NidaWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Felsinger v. QuinnWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Nolan v. ArnotWashington Supreme Court · 1904

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Corkum v. ClarkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  2. Brenner v. Port of BellinghamCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  3. Merrill v. Fremont Abstract Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Kent v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  5. Longview Fibre Co. v. StokesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API