Legal Opinion
Howie's Painting Service, Inc. v. Ferreria
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 10, 1987No. 5561PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
The defendant appeals from the trial court’s acceptance of an attorney factfinder’s report, and the subsequent rendering of judgment for the plaintiff. We find no error.
The defendant alleges that the trial court erred in rendering judgment for the plaintiff on the complaint and the counterclaim where (1) the facts ruled on were not supported by the evidence, (2) the subordinate facts found were in conflict with the ultimate factual conclusions, and (3) the facts found and the conclusions reached were inadequate to support the judgment.
The defendant’s claims of error are no more than a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Weiman v. WeimanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Wolk v. WolkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Filosi v. HawkinsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
- Edens v. Kole Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Nor'easter Group, Inc. v. Colossale Concrete, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Commissioner of Health Services v. Youth Challenge of Greater Hartford, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Argentinis v. GouldConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- Cowart v. GrimaldiConnecticut Superior Court · 1997