Legal Opinion

M.N. Dannenbaum, Inc. v. Brummerhop

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 3, 1992No. C14-91-01044-CVPublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DRAUGHN, Justice.

M.N. Dannenbaum, Inc. appeals from a take nothing judgment rendered in its suit against appellees alleging, among other claims, fraud, wrongful appropriation of confidential information, conspiracy, and tortious interference with contractual and business relations. Appellant raises five points of error claiming the trial court erred (1) in disregarding the jury’s findings of damages regarding stock fraud, (2) in granting a directed verdict on the claims of common law fraud, tortious interference, and breach of contract, and (3) in submitting an improper jury question…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Juliette Fowler Homes, Inc. v. Welch Associates, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Mobil Chemical Company v. BellTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  3. White v. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co., Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Bellefonte Underwriters Insurance Co. v. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Exxon Corp. v. QuinnTexas Supreme Court · 1987

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. St. Joseph Hospital v. WolffTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Alaniz v. Hoyt, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003
  3. Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc. v. CammarataDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
  4. Lee v. Lee, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
  5. Randolph v. Walker, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API