Legal Opinion
Filoon v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided September 30, 1994PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KELLEY, Judge.
Eleanor T. Filoon appeals pro se from an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC), which granted in part and denied in part Filoon’s exceptions to the initial decision of the administrative law judge (ALJ) dismissing a formal complaint filed by Filoon against Bell Telephone Company of Pennsylvania (Bell) 1. We affirm.
On March 12, 1992, Filoon filed a formal complaint against Bell alleging a conspiracy between Bell and Bell's bank to repeatedly submit for payment, cheeks for which there were insufficient funds, in order to assess multiple return check charges…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Park v. ChronisterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bishops, Inc. v. Penn National InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Leeward Construction, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Department of Environmental ProtectionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Murphy v. Today's Properties, Ltd.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Loma, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- C. Pfaff v. T. HeimbachCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2023