Legal Opinion

Bishops, Inc. v. Penn National Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 24, 2009No. 2275 WDA 2007, No. 35 WDA 2008PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

BENDER, J.:

¶ 1 Bishops, Inc., (Bishops) and Penn National Insurance (Penn National) cross-appeal the trial court’s orders granting summary judgment and awarding damages in favor of Bishops limited to the $5000 in coverage afforded by an extra-cost endorsement (the Penn Pac Endorsement) to an all-risks insurance policy that Bishops purchased from Penn National. In its cross-appeal, designated by the parties as primary pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 2136(a), Penn National asserts that Bishops’ claim is precluded by the concurrent cause provision of the basic policy to which the Penn Pac…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Collister v. Nationwide Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Tonkovic v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Leonard v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  4. Butterfield v. GiuntoliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Drelles v. Manufacturers Life Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. AntidormiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Penn-America Insurance v. Peccadillos, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Safe Auto Insurance Co. v. BerlinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Surabian Realty Co. v. NGM InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  5. Dixon v. GEICOSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API