Huffman v. City of Columbia
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Chief Justice Watts.
This is an application by petitioners to enjoin the enforcement of an ordinance passed by the City of Columbia. The return of the City of Columbia sets forth the reason of the passage of the ordinance in question, and contends:
That the ordinance in question “is a valid exercise of the police power vested in the City of Columbia, and is fully justified by the public convenience and necessity. The fundamental basis of the city’s exercise of this power is that the use of the streets of the city for the purpose of carrying on the…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Packard v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Orient Insurance v. DaggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Davis v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Ex parte DickeyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Owens v. Owens, MayorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
- City of Orangeburg v. FarmerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
- Fincher v. City of UnionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
- Painter v. Town of Forest AcresSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
- City of Charleston v. RobersonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.