Legal Opinion

City of Charleston v. Roberson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 4, 1980No. 21295PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ness, Justice:

Appellant City of Charleston appeals from an order invalidating a municipal ordinance and reversing respondent John Clifton Roberson’s conviction for its violation. We reverse.

Pursuant to § 5-7-30, Code of Laws of South Carolina (1976), the Charleston City Council adopted an ordinance that mule or horse drawn sightseeing vehicles be prohibited from operating on all or part of eight streets in the City’s historic district. Respondent, who was then engaged in the business of operating horse drawn carriage tours in the affected area, violated the ordinance. He was convicted in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Bob Jones University, Inc. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  3. City of Columbia v. AlexanderSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  4. McCoy v. Town of YorkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  5. Hall v. BatesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reed v. Northwestern Publishing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Captain Sandy's Tours, Inc. v. Georgetown County Building OfficialSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API