Legal Opinion
Rogers v. Baxter International Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided April 2, 2008No. 06-3241PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs are participants in the retirement plan for Baxter International’s employees. Each participant exercises some control over the investments in an individual account in this defined-contribution plan, though the plan and its trustees may limit what assets an account may contain and when trading may occur. In this suit *704under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, plaintiffs contend that Baxter and some of the plan’s trustees have violated § 409(a), 29 U.S.C. § 1109(a), in their capacity as fiduciaries. The defendants’ failing, according to the complaint,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. O'HaganSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Dirks v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- LaRue v. DeWolff, Boberg & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Spano v. the Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Howell v. Motorola, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- James Smith v. Board of Directors of Triad MaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
- Pfeil v. State Street Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Peabody v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.