State v. Chavis
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Judge.
The attorneys for defendants Chavis and Pevia have caused two separate records on appeal to be filed in this Court. There should have been but one. Rule 11(d), North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure. Each counsel will be personally taxed with a portion of the costs of the unnecessary record. Rule 9(b) (5) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure; see opinion of Chief Judge Brock in State v. Patricia Ann McKenzie, Case No. 7620SC74, which is filed contemporaneously herewith.
On appeal of defendant Chavis, counsel first contends that the court erred in denying the defendant’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. HankersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. GordonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- State v. BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. RigsbeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. EveretteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. AcklinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. LivingstonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. ChavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. PeviaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976