State v. Jones
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
The defendant first contends that the trial court erred in refusing to charge the jury on defense of home. In North Carolina, the courts have recognized a substantive right of an individual to defend his home from attack that is a separate right from that of an individual to defend himself or his family. State v. Spruill, 225 N.C. 356, 34 S.E. 2d 142 (1945).
When a trespasser enters upon a man’s premises, makes an assault upon his dwelling, and attempts to force an entrance into his house in a manner such as would lead a reasonably prudent man to believe that the intruder…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Hankerson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. HankersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. PotterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. JenningsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. McAvoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- State v. McAvoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992