Legal Opinion

State v. Livingston

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 7, 1978No. 7720SC648PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

By her first assignment of error, defendant contends that the trial court should have granted her motion for a directed verdict. This motion has the same legal effect as a motion to dismiss the action or a motion for judgment as in case of nonsuit, and it challenges the sufficiency of the State’s evidence to take the case *168to the jury. State v. Williams, 286 N.C. 422, 212 S.E. 2d 113 (1975). Defendant presented evidence in this case, and we, therefore, consider only her motion for a directed verdict made at the close of all the evidence. State v. Chavis, 30 N.C. App. 75, 226 S.E.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. State v. . FoustSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  3. State v. AustinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  4. State v. HelsabeckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. State v. SmitheyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API