State v. Livingston
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Judge.
By her first assignment of error, defendant contends that the trial court should have granted her motion for a directed verdict. This motion has the same legal effect as a motion to dismiss the action or a motion for judgment as in case of nonsuit, and it challenges the sufficiency of the State’s evidence to take the case *168to the jury. State v. Williams, 286 N.C. 422, 212 S.E. 2d 113 (1975). Defendant presented evidence in this case, and we, therefore, consider only her motion for a directed verdict made at the close of all the evidence. State v. Chavis, 30 N.C. App. 75, 226 S.E.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. . FoustSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
- State v. AustinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. HelsabeckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- State v. SmitheyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979