Legal Opinion

State v. Rigsbee

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 10, 1974No. 24PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice.

Defendant in his petition for certiorari brings forward four assignments of error. He first assigns as error the denial of his motion for a continuance based upon the absence of the witness Mary Helen Allen.

The crimes for which defendant was tried were alleged to have occurred on 21 May 1973. Defendant’s counsel conferred with defendant in early or mid-June 1973, at which time he was informed of the substance of a conversation between defendant and a Negro female known to him at that time only as Helen. On 31 August 1973 defendant’s counsel filed written motion for a disclosure…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. State v. BarfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. State v. RoperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. State v. BrowerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. State v. RiddickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. State v. SearlesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API