Legal Opinion

Willenbring v. Borkenhagen

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1966Published

1Opinion of the Court

29 Wis.2d 464 (1966)

WILLENBRING, by Guardian ad litem, and another, Respondents,

v.

BORKENHAGEN, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

December 2, 1965.

January 4, 1966.

For the appellant there was a brief by Hill, Miller & Quale of Baraboo, and oral argument by James H. Hill, Jr.

For the respondents there was a brief by Vaughn S. Conway and Kenneth H. Conway, both of Baraboo, and oral argument by Vaughn S. Conway.

BEILFUSS, J.

Because we reverse on the first ground and reinstate the jury's verdict, we do not consider the requests for new trial. The sole issue considered on this appeal is whether the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bleyer v. GrossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Blahnik v. DaxWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Mossak v. PfostWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Van Galder v. SnyderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Brice v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API