Mossak v. Pfost

The plaintiff contends (1) that the jury’s finding that defendant acted in self-defense is not sustained by the evidence; (2) that there was error in the instructions in that the court improperly placed the burden of proof that the defendant did not act in self-defense upon the plaintiff; and ( 3 ) that the jury’s finding that plaintiff suffered no damages renders the verdict perverse.(1). We have set forth enough of the conflicting testimony of the parties to demonstrate that it made an issue for the jury. Obviously, the jury believed defendant’s testimony, corroborated by that of a…