Application of Daniel Edwin Maloney
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ALMOND, Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the examiner’s rejection on prior art under 35 U.S.C. § 103 of claims 1, 5 and 6 in appellant’s application 1 for “Modified Hydrocarbon Polymers.”
The invention relates to a copolymer comprising at least 50 mol percent ethylene and at least 0.1-25 mol percent <x,[3 ethylenically unsaturated carboxylic acid chloride having 3-8 carbon atoms, for example, methaerylyl chloride (MAC1). A third monomer may be included in the polymeric molecule. The copolymer is useful as an adhesive, as a molding and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Application of Aubrey A. LarsenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
- Application of Joseph R. Riden, Jr., and James P. FlavinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- Application of Herman HoeksemaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
- Application of John Ferguson Harris, Jr., and Donald Irwin McCaneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- Application of James G. Burt and Henry C. WalterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re PayneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
- In re CokerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972