Legal Opinion

Application of Daniel Edwin Maloney

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 18, 1969No. Patent Appeal 8150PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALMOND, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the examiner’s rejection on prior art under 35 U.S.C. § 103 of claims 1, 5 and 6 in appellant’s application 1 for “Modified Hydrocarbon Polymers.”

The invention relates to a copolymer comprising at least 50 mol percent ethylene and at least 0.1-25 mol percent <x,[3 ethylenically unsaturated carboxylic acid chloride having 3-8 carbon atoms, for example, methaerylyl chloride (MAC1). A third monomer may be included in the polymeric molecule. The copolymer is useful as an adhesive, as a molding and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Application of Aubrey A. LarsenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
  2. Application of Joseph R. Riden, Jr., and James P. FlavinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  3. Application of Herman HoeksemaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
  4. Application of John Ferguson Harris, Jr., and Donald Irwin McCaneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  5. Application of James G. Burt and Henry C. WalterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re PayneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
  2. In re CokerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API