Legal Opinion
Remick v. Herring
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 19, 1946No. Civ. 7221PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is an appeal from an order amending a decree of distribution nunc pro tunc. In March, 1937, Stella Remick died testate, leaving surviving her her husband, Robert Murray Remick, and five brothers. The will of decedent, which was holographic, was duly admitted to probate, D. R. Herring, one of the brothers of Stella Remick, being appointed as executor of the estate pursuant to directions in the will. In due time said executor rendered his account, and petitioned for a decree of distribution, which decree was rendered November 1, 1937.
In May, 1945, Charles Herring, M. B. Herring,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Crim v. KessingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Bastajian v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Kaufman v. ShainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Estate of GoldbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Carpenter v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Eckstrom v. Citizens National Trust & Savings Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Youlian v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Muller v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Hansen v. HansenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- People v. ToneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.