Legal Opinion
Erdman v. Nationwide Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 23, 2009No. 07-3796PublishedCited by 192 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
HARDIMAN, Circuit Judge.
Brenda Erdman challenges the District Court’s summary judgment in favor of her former employer, Nationwide Insurance Company. The principal issue on appeal— whether Erdman accumulated sufficient hours to qualify for leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) — raises questions of first impression in this Court.
I
Our review of the District Court’s grant of summary judgment is plenary, viewing the facts in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party. Summary judgment is appropriate only if there are no genuine issues of material fact such…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- McTernan v. City of York, Pa.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Ragsdale v. Wolverine World Wide, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Richard Conoshenti v. Public Service Electric & Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Mary M. Tyndall v. National Education Centers, Incorporated of California, T/a Kee Business College Campus National Education Centers, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by192 opinions
- Lichtenstein v. University of Pittsburgh Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Fredrick Capps v. Mondelez Global LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Barbara Hager v. Arkansas Dept. of HealthCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Budhun v. Reading Hospital & Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Stansberry v. Air Wisconsin Airlines Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
187 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.