Legal Opinion

Frye v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1932No. Docket No. 117, Calendar No. 35,974PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

The night of October 17,1927, Domenic Tata, plaintiff’s decedent, was standing in a safety-zone in Hamilton avenue in the city of Detroit, waiting for a street car. An automobile struck and threw him upon the street car track where he lay-unconscious, with blood flowing from, cuts in his head. While so lying on the track, the fender of a street car picked him up, carried him some distance before the car stopped, and, when released, it was found that he had sustained a compound fracture of the left leg just above the ankle and his head and face were crushed. He moved his left leg and lips and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ramberg v. MorganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  2. Bruggeman v. City of YorkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  3. Dickson v. YatesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Geib v. SlaterMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Witucke v. Presque Isle BankMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Flynn v. KramerMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Meier v. HoltMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Warwick v. BlackneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1935

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API