Legal Opinion

Lattea v. City of Akron

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 23, 1982No. 82AP-65PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhiteside, P.J.

This appeal arises from an accident in which the west sidewalk of the Grant Street Bridge in Akron, Ohio, collapsed and fell onto Interstate 76, killing plaintiff’s decedents, Rev. and Mrs. John Barrickman. At the time that the sidewalk collapsed, demolí tion work on the bridge was being carried out by defendant-appellant, John G. Ruhlin Construction Company (hereinafter “Ruhlin”), pursuant to a contract with the state of Ohio, Department of Transportation (hereinafter “State”). The plaintiff-appellee, Emlous Lattea, Administrator of the Estates of Rev. and Mrs. Barrickman, brought a wrongful…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hollerbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Bello v. ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. TrowbridgeOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Globe Indemnity Co. v. SchmittOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Halkias v. Wilkoff Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1943

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Philip Morris, Inc. v. EmersonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
  2. Schneider National, Inc. v. Holland Hitch Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Mahathiraj v. Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Nevins v. Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Harris v. Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Court of Appeals · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API