Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Pine v. Board of Education

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 21, 1924No. 24,055PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dibéll, J.

An alternative writ of mandamus was issued by the district court to compel the board of education of Duluth and its officers to proceed with an election appointed to be held on March 25, 1924, upon a proposal for the issuance of bonds, in accordance with Laws 1923, p. 416, c. 305, providing for the registration of voters in home rule cities having a population of more than 50,000. The trial resulted in judgment for the defendants, and the relator appeals.

The question is whether voters must register. It is the contention of the board of education that they need not. Its two claims…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. West Duluth Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  2. Smith ex rel. Smith v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  3. Jackson v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  4. Brady v. MoultonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  5. Schroeder v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Behrendt v. Times Mirror Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
  2. Wichelmann v. City of GlencoeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  3. Lindquist v. AbbettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API