Legal Opinion

Wichelmann v. City of Glencoe

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 21, 1937No. 31,313PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

At a special election in the city of Glencoe on July 28, 1936, there were submitted the questions: Shall the city construct a light and power plant, and shall the city issue $75,000 in bonds for the purpose of constructing the plant? The contestant-respondent and contestee-respondent contend that a mere majority vote in favor of the propositions is sufficient, and the interveners contend that a 60 per cent vote in favor thereof is required. The court below held that 26 absentee voters’ ballots, of which 7 were cast in favor of and 19 against, the propositions, were procured,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Pennington v. HareSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  2. Straughan v. MeyersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1916
  3. Goodell v. Judith Basin CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1924
  4. State ex rel. Braley v. GaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  5. Talbott v. ThompsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1932

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Fugate v. Mayor and City Council of Town of BuffaloWyoming Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Hilliard v. ParkTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
  3. McMaster v. WilkinsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Bell v. GannawaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  5. Brown v. Dakota Public Service Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1941

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API