Legal Opinion

State v. Mills

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 21, 1966No. 5PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant offered no evidence. He assigns as error the denial of his motion for judgment of compulsory nonsuit entered at the close of the State’s evidence. The State’s evidence tends to show the following facts: Arthur Dillingham, a seventeen-year-old student, testified in substance: On 12 December 1965 he was driving a car in the vicinity of Baldwin Avenue on his way home. It was about 10 o’clock at night. A man passed him on the left side driving an automobile which went under a red light, struck a station wagon on the left side, and went off the right side of the road down an embankment.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. State v. GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. State v. PainterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. HankersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. State v. ZunigaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  3. State v. BarberCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  4. State v. DarkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  5. Bryant v. BallanceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API