Legal Opinion

State v. Zuniga

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 17, 1994No. 156A85(2)PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Chief Justice.

The question in this case is whether McKoy v. North Carolina, 494 U.S. 433, 108 L. Ed. 2d 369 (1990), which invalidated the then-existing unanimity requirement of our capital sentencing scheme, should be applied retroactively to capital cases which, like defendant’s, became final before McKoy was decided. Adopting the retroactivity standard announced in Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288, 103 L. Ed. 2d 334 (1989), we hold that McKoy must be applied retroactively to such cases. Because defendant was sentenced to death under jury instructions violative of McKoy, and because the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State v. HuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
  2. Windom v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  3. Rhoades v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Sherman Elwood Skipper v. James B. French, Warden of Central PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
  5. State v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API