Legal Opinion

Bryant v. Ballance

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 1971No. 717SC496PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

In her first assignment of error, plaintiff contends that the court erred in admitting certain evidence by defendant for that the evidence violated G.S. 8-51, the “Dead Man’s Statute.” Assuming, arguendo, that the challenged testimony did violate the statute, it was rendered admissible when the sister of intestate, as plaintiff’s witness, testified that defendant was driving and that he was not intoxicated. This opened the door for defendant’s version of the matter. Pearce v. Barham, 267 N.C. 707, 149 S.E. 2d 22 (1966) ; Carswell v. Greene, 253 N.C. 266, 116 S.E. 2d 801 (1960).…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pearce v. BarhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. Wilson v. CampSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. Carswell v. Greene Ex Rel. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. State v. . DawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  5. State v. MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. PattonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  2. Bowen v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API