Legal Opinion
Police Ret. Sys. of St. Louis v. Page
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided April 16, 2018No. H043220PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGrover, J.
*338In this derivative action, shareholders of Google, Inc. allege the corporation was harmed by executives who agreed to refrain from actively recruiting employees working for competitors. The trial court granted the defendants' summary judgment motion, finding the action barred by the applicable statute of limitations. We will affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs are three Google shareholders who brought separate derivative suits that were later consolidated. Defendants are officers and directors of Google, with the corporation itself included as a nominal defendant.1 The lawsuit stems from…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Edgar v. Mite Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Desimone v. BarrowsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2007
- In Re Tyson Foods, Inc. Consolidated Shareholder LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2007
- Solomon v. Pathe Communications Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Drulias v. 1ST Century Bancshares, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Genisman v. Carley, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Anders v. BaierDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2024
- Block v. Raines Feldman LLP CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Commerce Point Capital, Inc. v. First Data CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.