Legal Opinion

Sears v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1941No. 28197PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for breach of a contract which, the plaintiff alleges, was caused by the defendants. The answer was a general denial. The cause was tried to a jury, and resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of eleven hundred and fifty dollars. The defendants moved for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and, in the alternative, for a new trial, both of which motions were overruled. From the judgment entered on the verdict, the defendants appeal.

The principal question in the case is whether the evidence was sufficient to sustain the verdict…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Angle v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Bitterman v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. J. F. Parkinson Co. v. Building Trades CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Berry v. DonovanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  5. Pacific Typesetting Co. v. International Typographical UnionWashington Supreme Court · 1923

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Calbom v. KnudtzonWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  2. City of Seattle v. BlumeWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. John Davis & Co. v. Cedar Glen Four, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Sorenson v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  5. Holman v. CoieCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API